Every spiritual teaching is practiced through the body

If I had a phrase for 2025, it would've been "Once you see it, you can't unsee it."

And one of the things I kept seeing that I couldn't unsee was that spiritual teachings are never practiced in a vacuum. They're practiced through a body. Through a nervous system. Through a psyche that has spent decades learning what it had to do to survive.

Which means no teaching is ever communicated or received exactly as it was intended.

It's translated.

So, if your nervous system equates love with performance, you'll pressure yourself to perform spirituality well.

If your body learned that difficult emotions push people away, you'll use spiritual principles to distance yourself from your own experience.

If your sense of safety depends on control, you'll try to control reality in the name of enlightenment.

The teaching, no matter how beautifully conveyed, isn't separate from the one translating and practicing it.

This is why the same principle can liberate one person while quietly imprisoning another.

Take manifestation.

Many manifestation teachings emphasize "acting as if," embodying the reality you wish to create. There is truth in this, given the individual is able to maintain an authentic state of coherence (which contrary to public opinion does not include bypassing reality). However, I do wonder who authored this approach? What had motivated it?

You may think it's not important. Hell, five years ago, I didn't care in the least. I had more than enough evidence it worked and that's all that mattered at the time. But now, I realize why it appealed to me in the first place and was so effective.

Shocker... it's because I was so proficient at abandoning myself.

I had been "acting as if" my whole life. No wonder it was so easy. It quite literally felt like home to me, as a person who had a distorted nervous system baseline at the time. (One that perceived safety as neglect or abandonment.)

"Acting as if" is "Don't feel what you're actually feeling."

"Stay positive" is "Sadness will ruin my future."

"Ignore your current reality" is "Reject every part of me that doesn't already match the version of myself I'm trying to become."

Given our collective conditioning, you can see why this teaching is so popular, easily integrated and effective. Regardless of the conditions of the nervous system or psyche it was founded upon.

And so in our current climate, manifestation isn't an expression of conscious, embodied creation. It's self-abandonment wearing spiritual language.

The same thing happens with non-attachment.

Acceptance.

Presence.

Forgiveness.

Even love.

Every spiritual principle can become another sophisticated way to leave ourselves if our body believes that authenticity isn't safe.

Just to be clear, this isn't an argument against spirituality.

It's an invitation to include the human.

Because awakening doesn't happen instead of healing the psyche.

It happens through it.

Your body is interpreting every teaching. Your history is assigning meaning to every practice. Your nervous system decides whether a principle feels like permission... or pressure.

Spiritual maturity isn't measured by how well we can quote a teaching. It's measured by our ability to notice when we're using that teaching to escape ourselves.

I would argue the most spiritual thing we can do isn't "act as if."

It's admitting, "I don't feel abundant today."

"I'm scared."

"I'm hurting."

"I want to be somewhere other than where I am."

And then remaining in close contact with that experience without making it evidence that we've failed. Because no principle is more sacred than the living human trying to practice it.

If a teaching requires you to reject yourself in order to apply it, it has been lost in translation. Or perhaps its origin needs to be brought into question.

0 Comments

Every spiritual teaching is practiced through the body

Leave a comment

Archive